Feedback Response For CS69012, COMPUTING LAB II, L-T-P (0-0-6), Credit(4), Session 2013-2014, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE No. of students who have given feedback -35 Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.59

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  Teacher's Assesment I.1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.77 5.0 Bar I.2 Contribution of this laboratory in improving overall understanding of the subject [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.69 5.0 Bar I.3 Contribution of this laboratory in developing experimental / analytical / programming skills [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.69 5.0 Bar I.4 Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.71 5.0 Bar I.5 Quality of assignments and experiments [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.60 5.0 Bar I.6 Quality of evaluation [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.51 5.0 Bar I.7 Timely and helpful feedback [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.63 5.0 Bar I.8 Friendliness and approachability of the teacher [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.49 5.0 Bar I.10 Facilities available in laboratory for completion of design exercises / experiments [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.26 4.0 Bar Self Assesment of Students I.11 Your effort in studying the course [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 4.29 4.0 Bar I.12 Workload of this course in comparison with other courses [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 4.49 5.0 Bar I.13 Knowledge and skills of teaching assitants [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.54 5.0 Bar

Feedback Response For CS60078, COMPLEX NETWORK, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3), Session 2013-2014, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE No. of students who have given feedback -39 Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.43

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  Teacher's Assesment I.1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.51 5.0 Bar I.2 Stimulation of interest in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.59 5.0 Bar I.3 Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.54 5.0 Bar I.4 Pace / speed of teaching [1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast] 4.08 5.0 Bar I.5 Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.54 5.0 Bar I.6 Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.33 5.0 Bar I.7 Quality of evaluation [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.38 4.0 Bar I.8 Timely Feedback on student's performance [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.38 5.0 Bar I.9 Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.62 5.0 Bar I.10 Friendliness and approachability of the teacher [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.33 5.0 Bar Self Assesment of Students I.13 Your effort in studying the course [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 4.08 4.0 Bar I.14 Workload of this course in comparison with other courses [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 4.38 4.0 Bar