Feedback Response For CS21001, DISCRETE STRUCTURES, L-T-P (3-1-0), Credit(4), Session 2014-2015, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE No. of students who have given feedback -106 Average (for teacher's assessment) -3.88

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  Teacher's Assesment I.1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.96 4.0 Bar I.2 Stimulation of interest in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.70 4.0 Bar I.3 Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.88 4.0 Bar I.4 Pace / speed of teaching [1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast] 4.36 5.0 Bar I.5 Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.85 4.0 Bar I.6 Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.86 4.0 Bar I.7 Quality of evaluation [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.70 4.0 Bar I.8 Timely Feedback on student's performance [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.77 4.0 Bar I.9 Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.86 4.0 Bar I.10 Friendliness and approachability of the teacher [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 3.91 4.0 Bar Self Assesment of Students I.13 Your effort in studying the course [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 3.21 3.0 Bar I.14 Workload of this course in comparison with other courses [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 3.07 3.0 Bar

Feedback Response For CS60017, SOCIAL COMPUTING, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3), Session 2014-2015, Semester AUTUMN Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE No. of students who have given feedback -28 Average (for teacher's assessment) -4.35

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  Teacher's Assesment I.1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.43 5.0 Bar I.2 Stimulation of interest in the subject area [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.43 5.0 Bar I.3 Clarity of presentation and ease of understanding [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.43 5.0 Bar I.4 Pace / speed of teaching [1 = Too Slow, 3 = Slow, 5 = Just Right, 3 = Fast, 1 = Too Fast] 4.21 5.0 Bar I.5 Encouraging and responding to student's questions in the class [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.43 5.0 Bar I.6 Quality of tests , assignments and tutorials [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.29 5.0 Bar I.7 Quality of evaluation [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.32 5.0 Bar I.8 Timely Feedback on student's performance [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.18 4.0 Bar I.9 Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.54 5.0 Bar I.10 Friendliness and approachability of the teacher [1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very good, 5 = Excellent] 4.29 5.0 Bar Self Assesment of Students I.13 Your effort in studying the course [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 3.32 3.0 Bar I.14 Workload of this course in comparison with other courses [1 = Very Light, 2 = Light, 3 = Average, 4 = Heavy, 5 = Very Heavy] 3.71 4.0 Bar