Feedback Response For CS69012, COMPUTING LAB II, L-T-P (0-0-6), Credit(4), Session 2011-2012, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE 5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding No. of students who have given feedback -30 Average (for teacher's assessment) -

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  I .1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area 4.23 4.0 Bar I .2 Clarification of the objectives of the course 4.26 4.0 Bar I .3 Stimulation of student interest in the subject area 4.32 5.0 Bar I .4 Promotion of analytical / logical thinking 4.23 5.0 Bar I .5 Quality of assignments / experiments 4.39 5.0 Bar I .6 Facilities available in the class / lab for successful completion of design exercises/experiments. 4.29 4.0 Bar I .7 Encouraging students' questions in class 4.23 4.0 Bar I .8 Challenging tests 4.32 5.0 Bar I .9 Quality of evaluation 4.03 4.0 Bar I .10 Prompt and detailed feedback 3.97 4.0 Bar I .11 Help in the course work available outside the class 3.97 4.0 Bar I .12 Friendly and helpful towards students 4.29 5.0 Bar I .13 Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject 4.32 5.0 Bar I .14 Motivating ability of the teacher 4.23 4.0 Bar II.1 Rating the course structure 4.20 4.0 Bar II.2 Registered Students academic effort in studying the course 4.07 4.0 Bar II.3 Overall rating of the teacher 4.17 4.0 Bar

Feedback Response For CS60078, COMPLEX NETWORK, L-T-P (3-0-0), Credit(3), Session 2011-2012, Semester SPRING Faculty Name: ANIMESH MUKHERJEE 5 Point scale:: 1-Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Good, 4-Very Good, 5-Outstanding No. of students who have given feedback -27 Average (for teacher's assessment) -

# Question Text Response  Mean   Median   Display  I .1 Knowledge of the teacher in the subject area 4.18 4.0 Bar I .2 Clarification of the objectives of the course 3.96 4.0 Bar I .3 Stimulation of interest in the subject area 4.04 4.0 Bar I .4 Promotion of analytical/logical thinking 4.11 4.0 Bar I .5 Clarity of presentation 4.18 4.0 Bar I .6 Inclusion of recent developments with real life examples 4.14 4.0 Bar I .7 Encouraging questions in class 4.29 4.0 Bar I .8 Challenging tests 4.07 4.0 Bar I .9 Quality of evaluation 4.11 4.0 Bar I .10 Prompt and detailed feedback 4.07 4.0 Bar I .11 Help in the course work available outside the class 4.07 4.0 Bar I .12 Friendly and helpful towards students 4.39 4.0 Bar I .13 Enthusiasm of the teacher towards the subject 4.32 4.5 Bar I .14 Participation/academic interaction during class 4.14 4.0 Bar I .15 Quality of assignments and tutorials 4.00 4.0 Bar I .16 Number of assignments / tutorials (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right) 4.14 4.0 Bar I .17 Pace / speed of teaching (1=Too fast/too slow/uneven 5=Just right) 4.00 4.0 Bar II.1 Rating the course structure 4.22 4.0 Bar II.2 Registered Students academic effort in studying the course 3.89 4.0 Bar II.3 Considering all aspects of the teacher what would be your overall rating of the teacher? 4.15 4.0 Bar